This is an open forum for forestry issues of
interest or that serve to bring dialog forward regarding forestry today.
Send in e-mails or entire articles.
Please be civil.
Each month we will have a new article, this month see below:
Influencing the Outcome".
Click on the links below for past articles:
j. a. Kendrick
For almost three decades, we have worked to prove that our theory of “Ecosystem
Forestry, the Ecological Approach”, is feasible, and can create a known outcome- healthier, sustainable, forest
ecosystems. Though our original intent was only to influence the outcome of our own forest, over time we developed a hope
that our example could influence the outcome of forest management on a grander scale.
Growing up on ranches in the southwest as a kid, I had an inbred understanding of the interconnectedness of all living
things within an environment. We had to work hard to derive what we needed from the resources present, make use of the abundance
that nature provided, be frugal in what we took, and nurture the remainder so that it could continue to produce even more.
To me, it was simply our way of life, and it made perfect sense that we should take care of the Earth that we love so much.
My innate understanding of how biology, geology
and botany operated, along with good grades in these subjects, enabled me to study “Desert Ecology” in a U of
A scholarship program. My eyes were opened to the science of what I understood about nature. Learning Latin names for all
the plants & animals, earth functions, and lifeform interactions, was beyond enlightening to me. Combining
education and life experience gave me a viewpoint that others could not seem to identify with at all. While I saw myself as
a true Earthling, most people just saw me as a strange, reclusive, nature weirdo.
is, until later, when I met my husband. We were true environmentalists long before it became fashionable. Together, we dreamed
and planned of our life and our land, which became reality when we found our beautiful piece of Southern Oregon
forestland. While others of our generation protested, complained & talked endlessly about influencing forest management,
we decided to walk the path of our beliefs. We were convinced that our ideas regarding ecologically sound management of forests
would bring about better results than what was currently practiced, and understood that we could only have real
control or influence over land that we owned. So, we backed up our convictions with actions. We abandoned our comfortable
life, for one of struggle, self-sufficiency, and endless physical labor. It was also one of fulfillment, discovery, and wonder
each precious day.
If you have read our website, book, or articles, you already know what our ideas are
regarding ecosystem management. For those who haven’t: We view our forest as a grouping of individual ecosystems, and
management for the health of these ecosystems is of paramount importance. These ecosystems are comprised of all the myriad
living organisms, physical components, landform, solar aspect, weather, water, soil and many other inputs within an area that
create an interwoven web of life. Our forest has many individual ecosystems; from wetland & shady riparian areas, to mossy,
damp, north aspect slopes & dry, south aspect slopes. Our aim is for these systems to be healthy &
capable of sustaining the plethora of native trees, plants & forest creatures in each. For us, sustainablility means what
the earth is able to sustain- not what man wants it to sustain. Man will always demand more.
In this area, after generations of logging, forested ecosystems have become out of ecological balance
and cannot sustain themselves. They have devolved from conifer forests, to oak /madrone slopes and savannahs. By carefully
manipulating natural processes (mimicking those that take place in nature over time) we attempt to accelerate bringing the
ecosystems back into balance. We remove unhealthy, insect infested, and damaged trees; Replant tree & shrub species that
were native to the area, but which were lost due to human impacts; Thin overstocked areas to allow healthier, larger trees
to have more available nutrients, water & sunlight; Remove human debris, such as old cars, junk & trash; Replant &
naturalize riparian areas & waterways; Enhance habitat & food sources for wildlife; Prune lower limbs on trees, so
that they will not become fire fuel ladders…and many other activities specific and necessary to
improve the health of each area, and the forest as a whole.
It has meant hard, solitary
work, without incentives; large investments of both time & money; and withstanding the slings & arrows of those who
do not understand- nor want to understand, what we are doing. My writings have brought curses, threats, taunts & mocking
from both sides of the issue over the years. We have wondered, at times, if the sacrifices were worth it…if we made
any lasting difference at all. Of course, just walking through our forest makes it all worthwhile on a personal level. In
the past few years, we have been encouraged as we speak to people; see that my writings have been utilized & copied; our
website widely visited, linked & referenced as being an authoritative example of sustainable forest management. This gives
us hope that others may learn from our experience in our own forest experiment here in our private “nature lab”
on the forest farm. If we have influenced the outcome of even one forest ecosystem, we have served our purpose as responsible
Please comment on this article:
Reply from jak:
Click below to read
that we live by!
This section includes discussion that does not represent our own views. Comments are posted so that you
can see the wide array of viewpoints on this one simple issue and the sometimes uncivil attitude expressed by both sides.
note that many of the recent comments posted came from people on websites where jak's articles
were published online, titled:
"Forest Farming- The
Ecological Approach to Forest
" An Ecosystem Approach to Forestry"
Services- Making the Link"
"Ecosystem Services- A Concept Whose Time Has Come"
Follow these links:
( given in order noted above)
Comments & Questions:
We have cleared our comments board. We welcome
new comments, though they will be reviewed prior to posting.
Many people have asked why- this is due to a
mass mail attack from a "group" who does not agree with our forest management activities. It forced us to remove
everything and start over to remove the threat of a repeat.
Comment from af:
does not make any sense. I do not believe a word of it. Corporate fascists do not believe in conservation or anything else
except money. This is propaganda pure and simple.
Reply from jak:
Some people will never believe.
They have closed minds. The proof of our truth is visible in our website and in our forest. We have been here a long
time and will be here long after protesters have given up the "cause" and gone back home. There are many ways
to an end. Ours has taken a lifetime.
Comment from don r:
Great website. You have so much
information. I am working my way through your pages.
Reply from jak:
Glad you like it, hope
you are getting something usable. It is a lot of work to maintain and we appreciate hearing from people who visit our site.
Comment from janet v.:
It is encouraging to hear from women in forestry too. We seem to be pushed
Reply from jak:
Our forest management is a combined effort. We each have a perspective
and though we butt heads sometimes, the outcome is more balanced for the input and discussion. Learn enough to know what
you are talking about and persevere. There are plenty of classes available and you will be welcomed, not pushed aside.